<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who needs the slots and the ponies?</title>
	<link>http://PassOpenRecords.Org/2008/02/01/who-needs-the-slots-and-the-ponies/</link>
	<description>A Movement to Lift the Lid on Pennsylvania Government</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Open Records Watcher</title>
		<link>http://PassOpenRecords.Org/2008/02/01/who-needs-the-slots-and-the-ponies/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Records Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://PassOpenRecords.Org/2008/02/01/who-needs-the-slots-and-the-ponies/#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>I think the House (under current rules) has three options:
1. Concur, send the bill to the governor.
2. Non-concur and return the bill to the Senate, which I think then has to "insist" to set up a conference committee.
3. Suspend the rules and offer an amendment to SB 1. (Not sure if this happens on the floor, or in a committee, or what.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the House (under current rules) has three options:<br />
1. Concur, send the bill to the governor.<br />
2. Non-concur and return the bill to the Senate, which I think then has to &#8220;insist&#8221; to set up a conference committee.<br />
3. Suspend the rules and offer an amendment to SB 1. (Not sure if this happens on the floor, or in a committee, or what.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
