<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progress: 239-1</title>
	<link>http://PassOpenRecords.Org/2007/12/13/progress-239-1/</link>
	<description>A Movement to Lift the Lid on Pennsylvania Government</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: veblen</title>
		<link>http://PassOpenRecords.Org/2007/12/13/progress-239-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>veblen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://PassOpenRecords.Org/2007/12/13/progress-239-1/#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>While I think the General Assembly should have taken up a new Right-To-Know law last winter, given that they didn't, I don't think the delay until after Christmas is a bad thing. The delay  gives us a chance to ask questions about what we're getting.

Did this version of the bill eliminate the odious  provision which protected records created prior to the bills implementation? 

If it did, then the  delay in the implementation of the bill could be read as a  loophole which could give agencies time to destroy records  before the law made them public. For that reason, I would like to see a clause  in the bill which makes the destruction of records,which would ordinarily not be destroyed, a crime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think the General Assembly should have taken up a new Right-To-Know law last winter, given that they didn&#8217;t, I don&#8217;t think the delay until after Christmas is a bad thing. The delay  gives us a chance to ask questions about what we&#8217;re getting.</p>
<p>Did this version of the bill eliminate the odious  provision which protected records created prior to the bills implementation? </p>
<p>If it did, then the  delay in the implementation of the bill could be read as a  loophole which could give agencies time to destroy records  before the law made them public. For that reason, I would like to see a clause  in the bill which makes the destruction of records,which would ordinarily not be destroyed, a crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
